THE VALUE OF CONNECTED AGRONOMY

Better advice. More time for agronomy.

Keep laboratory results, field observations and farm history connected. Spend less time rebuilding the picture, bring more context into recommendations and work more closely with growers.

For agronomists, crop consultants and PCAs in the USA and Netherlands.
01 / SAVE TIME

Prepare once.
Keep using the context.

Reduce repeated searching, copying, comparisons and report assembly across your customer portfolio.

02 / BETTER RECOMMENDATIONS

See the evidence
in the field’s context.

Review measurements alongside history, observations and recent activities. Keep your professional judgement in control.

03 / BETTER COLLABORATION

Keep the grower
in the conversation.

Share clear advice, explain the reasoning and connect the plan to progress and follow-up.

YOUR WORKLOAD. YOUR ASSUMPTIONS.

Build your time-saving picture.

Explore what a connected workflow could mean for your practice. Enter your workload, then choose the reductions you want to investigate.

Start with your own figures, or explore an example.
Your advisory practice
In-season corrective recommendations

Advice triggered by a new result, symptom or crop issue.

Time per assignment: break down the work
Use minutes per complete assignment, including all relevant fields. Enter 0 for steps that take no time.
Pre-season fertilisation plans

A complete planning assignment for one farmer customer.

Time per assignment: break down the work
Use minutes per complete assignment, including all relevant fields. Enter 0 for steps that take no time.
Questions, follow-up and travel

Weekly totals across your portfolio. Include only work outside the assignments above; count calls made while driving once.

How the estimate works

For each recommendation step: farmer customers × assignments per farmer per year × minutes per assignment ÷ 60. The chosen reduction is applied to that step. Weekly support and travel use your active-week count. Additional remote review is subtracted from travel savings; setup is subtracted from the first-year total only.

The per-farmer result is an average of the agronomist’s hours, not the farmer’s own time savings. Avoid counting the same work in more than one category. No yield, quality or collaboration improvement is converted into money.

The calculator runs in your browser. Your entries are not submitted by this calculator. Downloading saves a text copy to your device.

THE EVIDENCE BEHIND THE OPPORTUNITY

The workflow problem is documented.

Research describes fragmented records, difficult data exchange and the need for field context. Your calculator scenario explores what improving that workflow could mean for you.

Purdue University · 2020
“Fifty-eight percent of farms share data with their agronomist”

A survey of 800 large US corn and soybean producers. Sharing data does not necessarily make it complete, comparable or ready to interpret.

Read the original source
Precision Agriculture · 2024
“only 55% of them provide an easy interoperable/exportable data format (excluding pdf)”

This finding concerns 29 software and web applications reviewed by the researchers. It measures tool capabilities, not the proportion of farms with fragmented records.

Read the original source
Penn State · Nutrient planning guidance
“avoiding repeated visits to the farm or calls to the operator”

The guidance explains how preparing and organising information can reduce repeat contact. It does not quantify software time savings.

Read the original source
University of Missouri · 2011
“Comparing soil and plant analysis results can greatly assist in the interpretations.”

Diagnostic guidance supports reviewing connected evidence. It explains the agronomic rationale; it does not measure SoilBeat recommendation quality.

Read the original source
VALUE BEYOND HOURS

What better advice and collaboration look like.

Time is one part of the picture. SoilBeat connects evidence, recommendations and what happens next, while the agronomist reviews and approves the advice.

Explore the advisory workflow
MORE CONTEXT

A recommendation you can explain.

Review measurements alongside crop history, observations and recent applications. Show the evidence and reasoning behind the action.

SHARED UNDERSTANDING

A clearer conversation with the grower.

Keep the current plan available, discuss practical constraints and make the next steps understandable.

CONNECTED FOLLOW-UP

Know what happened after the advice.

Bring actual applications, progress and new observations back into the next decision.

How to judge the benefits in your own practice

Compare the completeness, reasoning, calculations and practical clarity of recommendations. For collaboration, review turnaround time, grower understanding and whether actions are recorded. Faster delivery, deeper investigation and better dialogue are outcomes to assess; this page does not assign them an unsupported percentage or financial return.

Put the time you recover to work.

Explore SoilBeat with your own farm evidence, or talk to us about the workflow behind your estimate.